contentid seeks to facilitate reproducible workflows that involve external data files through the use of content identifiers.
Install the current development version using:
Instead of reading in data directly from a local file or URL, use register() to register permanent content-based identifiers for your external data file or URL:
register("https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/knb/d1/mn/v2/object/ess-dive-457358fdc81d3a5-20180726T203952542")
#> [1] "hash://sha256/9412325831dab22aeebdd674b6eb53ba6b7bdd04bb99a4dbb21ddff646287e37"Then, resolve() that content-based identifier in your scripts for more reproducible workflow. Optionally, set store=TRUE to enable local caching:
vostok <- resolve("hash://sha256/9412325831dab22aeebdd674b6eb53ba6b7bdd04bb99a4dbb21ddff646287e37",
store = TRUE)resolve will download and cryptographically verify the identifier matches the content, returning a local file path. Use that file path in the of our analysis script, e.g.
R users frequently write scripts which must load data from an external file – a step which increases friction in reuse and creates a common failure point in reproducibility of the analysis later on. Reading a file directly from a URL is often preferable, since we don’t have to worry about distributing the data separately ourselves. For example, an analysis might read in the famous CO2 ice core data directly from ORNL repository:
co2 <- read.table("https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/knb/d1/mn/v2/object/ess-dive-457358fdc81d3a5-20180726T203952542",
col.names = c("depth", "age_ice", "age_air", "co2"), skip = 21)However, we know that data hosted at a given URL could change or disappear, and not all data we want to work with is available at a URL to begin with. Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) were created to deal with these problems of ‘link rot’. Unfortunately, there is no straight forward and general way to read data directly from a DOI, (which almost always resolves to a human-readable webpage rather than the data itself), often apply to collections of files rather than individual source we want to read in our script, and we must frequently work with data that does not (yet) have a DOI. Registering a DOI for a dataset has gotten easier through repositories with simple APIs like Zenodo and figshare, but this is still an involved process and still leaves us without a mechanism to directly access the data. For instance, the data referenced above has DOI https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/ATG.009, but this is still not easy to work directly into our R scripts.
contentid offers a complementary approach to addressing this challenge, which will work with data that has (or will later receive) a DOI, but also with arbitrary URLs or with local files. The basic idea is quite similar to referencing data by DOI: we first “register” an identifier, and then we use that identifier to retrieve the data in our scripts:
register("https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/knb/d1/mn/v2/object/ess-dive-457358fdc81d3a5-20180726T203952542")
#> [1] "hash://sha256/9412325831dab22aeebdd674b6eb53ba6b7bdd04bb99a4dbb21ddff646287e37"Registering the data returns an identifier that we can resolve in our scripts to later read in the file:
co2_file <- resolve("hash://sha256/9412325831dab22aeebdd674b6eb53ba6b7bdd04bb99a4dbb21ddff646287e37")
co2_b <- read.table(co2_file,
col.names = c("depth", "age_ice", "age_air", "co2"), skip = 21)Note that we have manually embedded the identifier in our script, rather than automatically passing the identifier returned by register() directly to resolve. The command to register() needs to only be run once, and thus doesn’t need to be embedded in our script (though it is harmless to include it, as it will always return the same identifier unless the data file itself changes).
We can confirm this is the same data:
As the identifier (hash://sha256/...) itself suggests, this is merely the SHA-256 hash of the requested file. This means that unless the data at that URL changes, we will always get that same identifier back when we register that file. If we have a copy of that data someplace else, we can verify it is indeed precisely the same data. For instance, contentid includes a copy of this file as well. Registering the local copy verifies that it indeed has the same hash:
co2_file_c <- system.file("extdata", "vostok.icecore.co2", package = "contentid")
register(co2_file_c)
#> [1] "hash://sha256/9412325831dab22aeebdd674b6eb53ba6b7bdd04bb99a4dbb21ddff646287e37"We have now registered the same content at two locations: a URL and a local file path. resolve() will use this registry information to access the requested content. resolve() will choose a local path first, allowing us to avoid re-downloading any content we already have. resolve() will verify the content of any local file or file downloaded from a URL matches the requested content hash before returning the path. If the file has been altered in any way, the hash will no longer match and resolve() will try the next source.
We can get a better sense of this process by querying for all available sources for our requested content:
sources("hash://sha256/9412325831dab22aeebdd674b6eb53ba6b7bdd04bb99a4dbb21ddff646287e37")
#> # A tibble: 6 × 2
#> source date
#> <chr> <dttm>
#> 1 /home/cboettig/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/4.1/contenti… 2021-10-18 04:34:00
#> 2 /tmp/RtmpQ2vwJM/sha256/94/12/9412325831dab22aeebdd674b6eb… 2021-10-18 04:33:59
#> 3 https://archive.softwareheritage.org/api/1/content/sha256… 2021-10-18 04:34:01
#> 4 https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/knb/d1/mn/v2/object/ess-di… 2021-10-18 04:34:00
#> 5 https://zenodo.org/api/files/5967f986-b599-4492-9a08-94ce… 2021-10-18 04:22:27
#> 6 https://data.ess-dive.lbl.gov/catalog/d1/mn/v2/object/ess… 2021-10-06 05:43:31Note that sources() has found more locations than we have registered above. This is because in addition to maintaining a local registry of sources, contentid registers online sources with the Hash Archive, https://hash-archive.org. (The Hash Archive doesn’t store content, but only a list of public links at which content matching the hash has been seen.) query_sources() has also checked for this content on the Software Heritage Archive, which does periodic crawls of all public content on GitHub which have also picked up a copy of this exact file. With each URL is a date at which it was last seen - repeated calls to register() will update this date, or lead to a source being deprecated for this content if the content it serves no longer matches the requested hash. We can view the history of all registrations of a given source using history_url().
This approach can also be used with local or unpublished data. register()ing a local file only creates an entry in contentid’s local registry, so this does not provide a backup copy of the data or a mechanism to distribute it to collaborators. But it does provide a check that the data has not accidentally changed on our disk. If we move the data or eventually publish the data, we have only to register these new locations and we never need to update a script that accesses the data using calls to resolve() like read.table(resolve("hash://sha256/xxx...")) rather than using local file names.
If we prefer to keep a local copy of a specific dataset around, (e.g. for data that is used frequently or used across multiple projects), we can instruct resolve() to store a persistent copy in contentid’s local storage:
co2_file <- resolve("hash://sha256/9412325831dab22aeebdd674b6eb53ba6b7bdd04bb99a4dbb21ddff646287e37",
store = TRUE)Any future calls to resolve() with this hash on this machine will then always be able to load the content from the local store. This provides a convenient way to cache downloads for future use. Because the local store is based on the content identifier, repeatedly storing the same content will have no effect, and we cannot easily overwrite or accidentally delete this content.
register() and resolve() provide a low-friction mechanism to create a permanent identifier for external files and then resolve that identifier to an appropriate source. This can be useful in scripts that are frequently re-run as a way of caching the download step, and simultaneously helps ensure the script is more reproducible. While this approach is not fail-proof (since all registered locations could fail to produce the content), if all else fails our script itself still contains a cryptographic fingerprint of the data we could use to verify if a given file was really the one used.
contentid is largely based on the design and implementation of https://hash-archive.org, and can interface with the https://hash-archive.org API or mimic it locally. contentid also draws inspiration from Preston, a biodiversity dataset tracker, and Elton, a command-line tool to update/clone, review and index existing species interaction datasets.
This work is funded in part by grant NSF OAC 1839201 from the National Science Foundation.