corto (Correlation Tool): an R package to generate correlation-based DPI networks.
To install the corto stable version from CRAN:
{r install, eval=FALSE} install.packages("corto")
Alternatively, you can install the corto developmental version directly from Github:
library(devtools)
install_github("federicogiorgi/corto")
If you help us buying a cup of coffee, we will convert the caffeine into code improvements!
The corto (“correlation tool”) package provides a pipeline to infer networks between “centroid” and “target” variables in a dataset, using a combination of Pearson correlation and Data Processing Inequality (DPI), first proposed in [1]. The main application of corto is in the field of Bioinformatics and Transcriptomics, where co-occurrence between variables can be used as a mean to infer regulatory mechanisms [2] or gene functions [3]. In this field, usually the tested features are genes (or rather, their expression profile across samples), whereas the centroids are Transcription Factors (TFs) and their targets are Target Genes (TGs). The TF-TG co-expression can hint at a causal regulatory relationship, as proven in many studies [4,5,6]. The corto tool replicates the well-established pipeline of the ARACNe family of tools [7,8,9]
corto focuses on tho aspects:
In brief, corto operates using the following steps:
Here is how to run corto. First, install the package:
{r install, eval=FALSE} install.packages("corto")
Then, load it: {r load} library(corto)
Then, you can see how the input matrix looks like. For example, this
dataset comes from the TCGA mesothelioma project [13] and measures the
expression of 10021 genes across 87 samples:
{r load1} load(system.file("extdata","inmat.rda",package="corto")) inmat[1:5,1:5]
{r load2} dim(inmat)
Another input needed by corto
is a list of centroid features. In our case, we can specify a list of
TFs generated from Gene Ontology with the term “Regulation of
Transcription” [14].
{r load3} load(system.file("extdata","centroids.rda",package="corto")) centroids[15]
{r load4} length(centroids)
Finally, we can run corto. In this example, we will run it
with p-value threshold of 1e-30, 10 bootstraps and 2 threads
{r runcorto,message=FALSE,results="hide"} regulon<-corto(inmat,centroids=centroids,nbootstraps=10,p=1e-30,nthreads=2) # Input Matrix has 87 samples and 10021 features # Correlation Coefficient Threshold is: 0.889962633618839 # Removed 112 features with zero variance # Calculating pairwise correlations # Initial testing of triplets for DPI # 246 edges passed the initial threshold # Building DPI network from 37 centroids and 136 targets # Running 100 bootstraps with 2 thread(s) # Calculating edge likelihood # Generating regulon object
The regulon object is a list:
{r prinregulon} regulon[1:2]
The regulon in this dataset is composed of 34 final centroids with at
least one target: {r prinregulon2} length(regulon)
{r prinregulon3} names(regulon)
As an additional, optional feature, corto gives the user the possibility to provide Copy Number Variation (CNV) data, if available, which can generate spurious correlations between TFs and targets [15]. The gene expression profiles for the target genes are corrected via linear regression and the residuals of the expression~cnv model substitute the original gene expression profile.
In this example, a CNV matrix is provided. The analysis will be run
only for the features (rows) and samples (columns) present in both
matrices
{r runcnv} load(system.file("extdata","cnvmat.rda",package="corto",mustWork=TRUE)) regulon <- corto(inmat,centroids=centroids,nthreads=2,nbootstraps=10,verbose=TRUE,cnvmat=cnvmat,p=0.01)
[1] Reverter, Antonio, and Eva KF Chan. “Combining partial correlation and an information theory approach to the reversed engineering of gene co-expression networks.” Bioinformatics 24.21 (2008): 2491-2497.
[2] D’Haeseleer, Patrik, Shoudan Liang, and Roland Somogyi. “Genetic network inference: from co-expression clustering to reverse engineering.” Bioinformatics 16.8 (2000): 707-726.
[3] Hansen, Bjoern O., et al. “Elucidating gene function and function evolution through comparison of co-expression networks of plants.” Frontiers in plant science 5 (2014): 394.
[4] Basso, Katia, et al. “Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells.” Nature genetics 37.4 (2005): 382. [5] Amar, David, Hershel Safer, and Ron Shamir. “Dissection of regulatory networks that are altered in disease via differential co-expression.” PLoS computational biology 9.3 (2013): e1002955.
[6] Vandepoele, Klaas, et al. “Unraveling transcriptional control in Arabidopsis using cis-regulatory elements and coexpression networks.” Plant physiology 150.2 (2009): 535-546.
[7] Margolin, Adam A., et al. “ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context.” BMC bioinformatics. Vol. 7. No. 1. BioMed Central, 2006.
[8] Lachmann, Alexander, et al. “ARACNe-AP: gene network reverse engineering through adaptive partitioning inference of mutual information.” Bioinformatics 32.14 (2016): 2233-2235.
[9] Khatamian, Alireza, et al. “SJARACNe: a scalable software tool for gene network reverse engineering from big data.” Bioinformatics 35.12 (2018): 2165-2166.
[10] Giorgi, Federico M., et al. “Comparative study of RNA-seq-and microarray-derived coexpression networks in Arabidopsis thaliana.” Bioinformatics 29.6 (2013): 717-724.
[11] Usadel, Björn, et al. “Co‐expression tools for plant biology: opportunities for hypothesis generation and caveats.” Plant, cell & environment 32.12 (2009): 1633-1651.
[12] Alvarez, Mariano J., Federico Giorgi, and Andrea Califano. “Using viper, a package for Virtual Inference of Protein-activity by Enriched Regulon analysis.” Bioconductor (2014): 1-14.
[13] Ladanyi, Marc, et al. “The TCGA malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) project: VISTA expression and delineation of a novel clinical-molecular subtype of MPM.” (2018): 8516-8516.
[14] Gene Ontology Consortium. “The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.” Nucleic acids research 32.suppl_1 (2004): D258-D261.
[15] Schubert, Michael, et al. “Gene networks in cancer are biased by aneuploidies and sample impurities.” Biochimica et Biophisica Acta - Gene Regulatory Models (2019): 194444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.194444