The package optedr is an optimal experimental design suite for calculating optimal designs, D-augmenting designs and efficiently rounding approximate design. Among its capabilities are:
You can install the released version of optedr from CRAN with:
You can install the latest version of the package from GitHub with:
The user available functions are:
opt_des()
calculates optimal designs.design_efficiency()
evaluates the efficiency of a design against the optimum.augment_design()
augments designs, allowing the user to add points controlling the D-efficiency.efficient_round()
efficiently round approximate designs.shiny_optimal()
demo of optimal designs calculation with a graphical interface, applied to Antoine’s Equation.shiny_augment()
demo of augmenting design with a graphical interface, usable for a handful of models.The optdes
object generated by opt_des()
has its own implementation of print()
, summary()
and plot()
.
The calculation of an optimal design requires a to specify the Criterion
, the model
, the parameters
and their initial values and the design_space
.
resArr.D <- opt_des(Criterion = "D-Optimality",
model = y ~ a*exp(-b/x),
parameters = c("a", "b"),
par_values = c(1, 1500),
design_space = c(212, 422))
#> i Stop condition not reached, max iterations performed
#> i The lower bound for efficiency is 99.9986396401789%
resArr.D$optdes
#> Point Weight
#> 1 329.2966 0.5000068
#> 2 422.0000 0.4999932
resArr.D$sens
After calculating the D-optimal design, the user might want to add points to the design to fit their needs:
aug_arr <- augment_design(resArr.D$optdes, 0.3, y ~ a * exp(-b/x),
parameters = c("a", "b"),
par_values = c(1, 1500),
design_space = c(212, 422),
F)
#> The region(s) are [250.98-422]The region(s) are [250.98-422]The region(s) are [250.98-422]
aug_arr
#> Point Weight
#> 1 329.2966 0.3500048
#> 2 422.0000 0.3499952
#> 3 260.0000 0.1500000
#> 4 380.0000 0.1500000
This new design can be rounded to the desired number of points:
(exact_design <- efficient_round(aug_arr, 20))
#> Point Weight
#> 1 329.2966 7
#> 2 422.0000 7
#> 3 260.0000 3
#> 4 380.0000 3
And its efficiency compared against the optimum: